2014 ATP Distribution
Geographic distribution is not a factor in selecting projects in the competitive ATP, but it will be looked at in evaluation of the program. I analyzed the distribution of 2014 ATP projects (in the statewide and small urban/rural components) among the twelve Caltrans Districts in a prior post. Here are other ways to look at how the program was distributed.
Urban / Rural
The classification of an area in the program is defined by its population:
- Urban: Populations greater than 200,000.
- Rural1: Populations of 200,000 or less.
Here’s how the applications came in:
Type | # | % | Total $ | % |
---|---|---|---|---|
Urban | 626 | 81.2 | 847,319 | 83.1 |
Rural | 145 | 18.8 | 170,528 | 16.7 |
- #: Number of applications submitted
- %: Number of applications submitted / Total number of applications received for first solicitation (771)2
- Total $: Amount (in $1,000s) of request(s)
- %: Amount of request(s) / Total request amount from applications received for first solicitation ($1,019,722)
Here’s how the components were programmed:
Statewide
Type | # | % | Total $ | % |
---|---|---|---|---|
Urban | 113 | 89.7 | 170,101 | 92.5 |
Rural | 12 | 9.5 | 11,867 | 6.5 |
- #: Number of projects awarded
- %: Number of projects awarded / Total number of projects awarded in statewide component (125)2
- Total $: Amount (in $1,000s) awarded
- %: Amount awarded / Total amount awarded in statewide component ($183,843,000)
Small Urban/Rural
Type | # | % | Total $ | % |
---|---|---|---|---|
Urban | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Rural | 22 | 100.0 | 37,005 | 100.0 |
- #: Number of projects awarded
- %: Number of projects awarded / Total number of projects awarded in small urban/rural component (22)
- Total $: Amount (in $1,000s) awarded
- %: Amount awarded / Total amount awarded in small urban/rural component ($37,005,000)
MPO
Here’s how the applications came in by MPO3:
MPO | # | % | Total $ | % |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMBAG | 19 | 2.5 | 32,249 | 3.2 |
BCAG | 12 | 1.6 | 7,819 | 0.8 |
FCOG | 18 | 2.3 | 7,379 | 0.7 |
KCAG | 1 | 0.1 | 678 | 0.1 |
KCOG | 38 | 4.9 | 23,580 | 2.3 |
MCAG | 7 | 0.9 | 7,948 | 0.8 |
MCTC | 3 | 0.4 | 1,343 | 0.1 |
MTC | 122 | 15.8 | 178,054 | 17.5 |
Rural | 56 | 7.3 | 45,096 | 4.4 |
SACOG | 46 | 6.0 | 48,289 | 4.7 |
SANDAG | 55 | 7.1 | 76,914 | 7.5 |
SBCAG | 21 | 2.7 | 39,035 | 3.8 |
SCAG | 272 | 35.2 | 448,939 | 44.0 |
SJCOG | 29 | 3.8 | 25,668 | 2.5 |
SLOCOG | 14 | 1.8 | 19,230 | 1.9 |
SRTA | 7 | 0.9 | 4,706 | 0.5 |
StanCOG | 8 | 1.0 | 5,139 | 0.5 |
State | 1 | 0.1 | 1,875 | 0.2 |
TCAG | 39 | 5.1 | 33,554 | 3.3 |
TRPA | 4 | 0.5 | 12,227 | 1.2 |
- #: Number of applications submitted
- %: Number of applications submitted / Total number of applications received for first solicitation (772)
- Total $: Amount (in $1,000s) of request(s)
- %: Amount of request(s) / Total request amount from applications received for first solicitation ($1,019,722)
Here’s how the components were programmed:
Statewide
MPO | # | % | Total $ | % |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMBAG | 2 | 1.6 | 1,360 | 0.7 |
BCAG | 1 | 0.8 | 1,388 | 0.8 |
FCOG | 2 | 1.6 | 1,022 | 0.6 |
KCAG | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
KCOG | 6 | 4.8 | 4,522 | 2.5 |
MCAG | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
MCTC | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
MTC | 11 | 8.7 | 26,062 | 14.2 |
Rural | 5 | 4.0 | 3,178 | 1.7 |
SACOG | 7 | 5.6 | 6,502 | 3.5 |
SANDAG | 14 | 11.1 | 13,662 | 7.4 |
SBCAG | 2 | 1.6 | 3,145 | 1.7 |
SCAG | 68 | 54.0 | 115,199 | 62.7 |
SJCOG | 4 | 3.2 | 3,022 | 1.6 |
SLOCOG | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
SRTA | 2 | 1.6 | 2,796 | 1.5 |
StanCOG | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
State | 1 | 0.8 | 1,875 | 1.0 |
TCAG | 1 | 0.8 | 110 | 0.1 |
TRPA | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
- #: Number of projects awarded
- %: Number of projects awarded / Total number of projects awarded in statewide component (126)
- Total $: Amount (in $1,000s) awarded
- %: Amount awarded / Total amount awarded in statewide component ($183,843,000)
Small Urban/Rural
MPO | # | % | Total $ | % |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMBAG | 4 | 18.2 | 12,354 | 33.4 |
BCAG | 2 | 9.1 | 1,828 | 4.9 |
FCOG | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
KCAG | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
KCOG | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
MCAG | 2 | 9.1 | 2,739 | 7.4 |
MCTC | 1 | 4.5 | 550 | 1.5 |
MTC | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Rural | 6 | 27.3 | 8,808 | 23.8 |
SACOG | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
SANDAG | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
SBCAG | 6 | 27.3 | 9,976 | 27.0 |
SCAG | N/A | NA | N/A | N/A |
SJCOG | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
SLOCOG | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
SRTA | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
StanCOG | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
State | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
TCAG | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
TRPA | 1 | 4.5 | 750 | 2.0 |
- #: Number of projects awarded
- %: Number of projects awarded / Total number of projects awarded in small urban/rural component (22)
- Total $: Amount (in $1,000s) awarded
- %: Amount awarded / Total amount awarded in small urban/rural component ($37,005,000)
County
I also analyzed how the program was distributed among the counties. Here’s how it looked for the program’s first solicitation:
County | # | % | Total $ | % |
---|---|---|---|---|
ALA | 32 | 4.1 | 35,507 | 3.5 |
AMA | 3 | 0.4 | 2,151 | 0.2 |
BUT | 12 | 1.6 | 7,819 | 0.8 |
CAL | 2 | 0.3 | 88 | 0.0 |
CC | 15 | 1.9 | 19,732 | 1.9 |
DN | 5 | 0.6 | 3,393 | 0.3 |
ED | 10 | 1.3 | 4,857 | 0.5 |
FRE | 18 | 2.3 | 7,379 | 0.7 |
GLE | 1 | 0.1 | 85 | 0.0 |
HUM | 11 | 1.4 | 14,080 | 1.4 |
IMP | 10 | 1.3 | 7,222 | 0.7 |
INY | 3 | 0.4 | 790 | 0.1 |
KER | 38 | 4.9 | 23,580 | 2.3 |
KIN | 1 | 0.1 | 678 | 0.1 |
LA | 119 | 15.4 | 267,992 | 26.3 |
LAK | 3 | 0.4 | 1,131 | 0.1 |
MAD | 3 | 0.4 | 1,343 | 0.1 |
MAR | 1 | 0.1 | 441 | 0.0 |
MEN | 6 | 0.8 | 5,037 | 0.5 |
MER | 7 | 0.9 | 7,948 | 0.8 |
MNO | 5 | 0.6 | 3,457 | 0.3 |
MON | 7 | 0.9 | 25,160 | 2.5 |
MRN | 16 | 2.1 | 16,501 | 1.6 |
NAP | 3 | 0.4 | 4,207 | 0.4 |
NEV | 6 | 0.8 | 7,319 | 0.7 |
ORA | 62 | 8.0 | 50,111 | 4.9 |
PLA | 4 | 0.5 | 4,727 | 0.5 |
PLU | 2 | 0.3 | 1,874 | 0.2 |
RIV | 34 | 4.4 | 52,494 | 5.1 |
SAC | 20 | 2.6 | 23,496 | 2.3 |
SB | 21 | 2.7 | 39,035 | 3.8 |
SBD | 32 | 4.1 | 56,247 | 5.5 |
SBT | 1 | 0.1 | 1,200 | 0.1 |
SCL | 18 | 2.3 | 28,197 | 2.8 |
SCR | 11 | 1.4 | 5,889 | 0.6 |
SD | 55 | 7.1 | 76,914 | 7.5 |
SF | 8 | 1.0 | 12,720 | 1.2 |
SHA | 7 | 0.9 | 4,706 | 0.5 |
SIS | 5 | 0.6 | 2,013 | 0.2 |
SJ | 29 | 3.8 | 25,668 | 2.5 |
SLO | 14 | 1.8 | 19,230 | 1.9 |
SM | 13 | 1.7 | 25,613 | 2.5 |
SOL | 7 | 0.9 | 11,255 | 1.1 |
SON | 9 | 1.2 | 12,459 | 1.2 |
STA | 8 | 1.0 | 5,139 | 0.5 |
SUT | 4 | 0.5 | 2,088 | 0.2 |
TRI | 1 | 0.1 | 2,087 | 0.2 |
TUL | 39 | 5.1 | 33,554 | 3.3 |
TUO | 2 | 0.3 | 1,150 | 0.1 |
VAR | 6 | 0.8 | 30,634 | 3.0 |
VEN | 12 | 1.6 | 8,843 | 0.9 |
YOL | 8 | 1.0 | 11,778 | 1.2 |
YUB | 3 | 0.4 | 2,704 | 0.3 |
- #: Number of applications submitted
- %: Number of applications submitted / Total number of applications received for first solicitation (772)
- Total $: Amount (in $1,000s) of request(s)
- %: Amount of request(s) / Total request amount from applications received for first solicitation ($1,019,722)
Here’s how the components were programmed:
Statewide
County | # | % | Total $ | % |
---|---|---|---|---|
ALA | 4 | 3.2 | 9,070 | 4.9 |
AMA | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
BUT | 1 | 0.8 | 1,388 | 0.8 |
CAL | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
CC | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
DN | 1 | 0.8 | 60 | 0.0 |
ED | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
FRE | 2 | 1.6 | 1,022 | 0.6 |
GLE | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
HUM | 2 | 1.6 | 1,400 | 0.8 |
IMP | 1 | 0.8 | 985 | 0.5 |
INY | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
KER | 6 | 4.8 | 4,522 | 2.5 |
KIN | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
LA | 37 | 29.4 | 70,838 | 38.5 |
LAK | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
MAD | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
MAR | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
MEN | 2 | 1.6 | 1,718 | 0.9 |
MER | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
MNO | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
MON | 1 | 0.8 | 913 | 0.5 |
MRN | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
NAP | 1 | 0.8 | 3,600 | 2.0 |
NEV | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
ORA | 9 | 7.1 | 5,687 | 3.1 |
PLA | 1 | 0.8 | 1,236 | 0.7 |
PLU | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
RIV | 12 | 9.5 | 21,931 | 11.9 |
SAC | 3 | 2.4 | 3,676 | 2.0 |
SB | 2 | 1.6 | 3,145 | 1.7 |
SBD | 7 | 5.6 | 9,925 | 5.4 |
SBT | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
SCL | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
SCR | 1 | 0.8 | 447 | 0.2 |
SD | 14 | 11.1 | 13,662 | 7.4 |
SF | 3 | 2.4 | 3,504 | 1.9 |
SHA | 2 | 1.6 | 2,796 | 1.5 |
SIS | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
SJ | 4 | 3.2 | 3,022 | 1.6 |
SLO | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
SM | 2 | 1.6 | 9,500 | 5.2 |
SOL | 1 | 0.8 | 388 | 0.2 |
SON | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
STA | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
SUT | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
TRI | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
TUL | 1 | 0.8 | 110 | 0.1 |
TUO | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
VAR | 3 | 2.4 | 7,708 | 4.2 |
VEN | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
YOL | 2 | 1.6 | 1,101 | 0.6 |
YUB | 1 | 0.8 | 489 | 0.3 |
- #: Number of projects awarded
- %: Number of projects awarded / Total number of projects awarded in statewide component (126)
- Total $: Amount (in $1,000s) awarded
- %: Amount awarded / Total amount awarded in statewide component ($183,843,000)
Small Urban/Rural
County | # | % | Total $ | % |
---|---|---|---|---|
ALA | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
AMA | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
BUT | 2 | 9.1 | 1,828 | 4.9 |
CAL | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
CC | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
DN | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
ED | 1 | 4.5 | 750 | 2.0 |
FRE | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
GLE | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
HUM | 3 | 13.6 | 6,465 | 17.5 |
IMP | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
INY | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
KER | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
KIN | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
LA | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
LAK | 1 | 4.5 | 564 | 1.5 |
MAD | 1 | 4.5 | 550 | 1.5 |
MAR | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
MEN | 1 | 4.5 | 259 | 0.7 |
MER | 2 | 9.1 | 2,739 | 7.4 |
MNO | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
MON | 2 | 9.1 | 11,142 | 30.1 |
MRN | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
NAP | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
NEV | 1 | 4.5 | 1,520 | 4.1 |
ORA | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
PLA | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
PLU | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
RIV | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
SAC | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
SB | 6 | 27.3 | 9,976 | 27.0 |
SBD | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
SBT | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
SCL | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
SCR | 2 | 9.1 | 1,212 | 3.3 |
SD | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
SF | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
SHA | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
SIS | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
SJ | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
SLO | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
SM | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
SOL | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
SON | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
STA | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
SUT | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
TRI | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
TUL | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
TUO | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
VAR | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
VEN | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
YOL | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
YUB | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 |
- #: Number of projects awarded
- %: Number of projects awarded / Total number of projects awarded in small urban/rural component (22)
- Total $: Amount (in $1,000s) awarded
- %: Amount awarded / Total amount awarded in small urban/rural component ($37,005,000)
Update 9/8/14: Added clarification for table headers and corrected ubran project percentage (revised from 81.1 to 81.2).